In September 2016, Barr secured orders sealing the records of these two adjudications and declaring that "o long as this case remains sealed, the offenses. Barr's remaining two juvenile adjudications are class A felonies. RCW 9.41.040(4) does not apply to class A felonies and sex offenses. The order was issued pursuant to RCW 9.41.040(4), which allows a court to restore firearm rights after an individual has spent a number of consecutive years in the community without being convicted of any other crimes. In 2016, Barr received an order restoring his firearm rights as to the three adult convictions and one of the offenses he committed as a juvenile. Factual Background and Procedural History In 1992, when he was a juvenile, Barr was adjudicated guilty of three offenses, two of which are classified as class A felonies.^ His criminal history also includes three convictions as an adult between 19. 96072-1 hold that Barr is not entitled to a writ of mandamus requiring the Sheriff to issue him a CPL. We therefore reverse the Court of Appeals and Barr v. Due to respondent Jerry Barr's class A felony adjudications, federal law provides that it is unlawful for him to "possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition." 18 U.S.C. The Sheriff is not required to issue a CPL to a person who "is prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law." RCW 9.41.070(l)(a). This case asks us to decide whether the Snohomish County sheriff (the Sheriff) is required to issue a concealed pistol license(CPE)to an individual whose sealed juvenile record includes adjudications for class A felonies. SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF, Filed: HAY 0 9 2019 Petitioner. Carlson Supreme Court Clerk CHIEFJUSTIGE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JERRY L. FniE\ IN CLERKS OFFICE suksme This opinion was filed for record at o'im.on JVLAin^ 3^/
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |